3 ms·
Syntax highlighting would be great indeed, I didn't implement it because it didn't seem like the most important thing to do. The project is open source though,
by janpaul123 14y ago
Syntax highlighting would be great indeed, I didn't implement it because it didn't seem like the most important thing to do. The project is open source though, so if you would like to implement syntax highlighting or CS support, then that would be superb! :D
- goldfeld 14y agoHow do you feel the extra step of compiling to CoffeeScript would impact performance and response time? I have been considering contributing in that direction.
- janpaul123 14y agoProbably a limited performance impact. But keep in mind that my current parser doesn't even allow creation of objects, closures, etc., so the value of adding CoffeeScript is also rather limited, at this point. :-(
- iso8859-1 14y agoIs there any reason you didn't use CodeMirror? You'd have gotten completion and syntax-highlighting for free then.
- janpaul123 14y agoYes, it would have cost me more time. Would be great to have though. :)