So, like google except not anywhere near as fast? I tried it, the results were ok, I didn't see any result that was better than Google (or bing). I'm suspicio

So, like google except not anywhere near as fast? I tried it, the results were ok, I didn't see any result that was better than Google (or bing). I'm suspicious of anything that starts out by saying search is broken. It isn't. All these things you have built like sentiment analysis and summarization etc do nothing new than using page rank. The reason is, those balanced review, well written pages are the same ones that humans have curated and used in their own citations. People do a much better job of language understanding than some simple sentiment analysis and the other other things you do. Because humans do it better, when google comes along and leverages all that human curation, the results are staggeringly good. Sure, there are easy to find edge cases, just like there were with your engine when i tried it, but I don't see anything new here. Maybe you could provide some example queries that demonstrate it producing better results than google or bing? If, you could do comparison queries like Nikon vs canon and it produced a summarized report, that would be interesting, but it didn't do that. Song lyrics are easy! That doesn't demo anything, nothing could be easier for a search engine than song lyrics...