And you're betraying more than you realize by focusing on weapons as a proxy for tactics; professionals focus on logistics Oh, ok then you shouldn't mind elimi

And you're betraying more than you realize by focusing on weapons as a proxy for tactics; professionals focus on logistics Oh, ok then you shouldn't mind eliminating some types of weapons like assault rifles. Any revolutionary force attempting to throw off a tyrannical U.S. gov't will just use tactics and logistics. As for nuclear weapons, they're only relevant if you expect the government's response to be the nuking of opposition cities. Exactly. So nukes should be legal to own just as much as assault rifles. There is no other way to throw off the U.S. gov't. But only crazy people would think nukes should be legal - so that whole throw off the gov't argument is rubbish, and assault rifles won't help there either. to require its (very careful) overthrow My point was in fact that there is no such thing as an armed "very careful" overthrow of the U.S. gov't. Such a thing is complete nonsense, like unicorns.