It is evident in this case. However, with almost any crime, the right of the people could be considered to trump the suspect right. It is a normal and sane tha

It is evident in this case. However, with almost any crime, the right of the people could be considered to trump the suspect right. It is a normal and sane that a society scrutinise those cases, to make sure the exceptional stays exceptional and not the first step down a slippery slope. There is an argument for fear in this case. The amount of exception done for terrorism "seems" quite big, compared to, for example, the cases of proven criminal let go for technical reason. Yet, there does not "seem" to be the same amount of exception to avoid due process in the name of public safety. Also, other exception, like arresting money instead of the people in case of the war on drug. It has been proven many time that this quite clever exception, has been widely abused. (disclaimer: "seem" between quotes because lack of hard data, and skills to find them. Would be interesting to have them though.)