3 ms·
Original paper at [0], some corrections/comments at [1,2]. [3] argues that the proposed new ideas and the classical (Newtonian, If I understood this correctly)
by claudius 14y ago
Original paper at [0], some corrections/comments at [1,2]. [3] argues that the proposed new ideas and the classical (Newtonian, If I understood this correctly) concept of gravity are actually identical, given suitable identifications of various entities.
[0] http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785 http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785
[1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5858 http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5858
[2] http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3876 http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3876
[3] http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1015 http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1015
- davidweir 14y agoUseful to note that parent's Ref. 0 has been peer-reviewed and is published in JHEP, a respectable high energy physics journal. Sadly, articles like those linked often do not check the authors' credentials or whether the research being summarised has been successfully published somewhere rather than just put on the arXiv. The BBC (and possibly others) go further, asking rival or independent researchers to comment on new work; this approach (check for peer review and also seeking critical comment from third parties) should be the expected standard in scientific news reporting for a lay audience. DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029