3 ms·
Where do you see it learning to walk? You can't equate the inverted pendulum problem with upright walking. It is neat if it can choose it's own reference level
by Matti 13y ago
Where do you see it learning to walk? You can't equate the inverted pendulum problem with upright walking. It is neat if it can choose it's own reference level ("goal") for a classical control problem -- but that's a long way from "learning to walk".
- pitchups 13y agoGranted that their model for upright walking is very basic. But if their basic premise is sound and valid and taking their claims at face value, it could potentially explain how more complex behaviors like walking may emerge from the simpler examples in their demo.