| which is why evidence obtained as a result of | a Miranda-less interrogation is nonetheless | admissible I don't know. I think that it seems reasonable t

| which is why evidence obtained as a result of | a Miranda-less interrogation is nonetheless | admissible I don't know. I think that it seems reasonable that if statements obtained by police from a Miranda-less interrogation are inadmissible, then evidence that is a direct result of those statements should be to. The statements and the evidence that is linked to them seem like they are all part of the same package. The only exception I can see here is if there is a reasonable/convincing argument that police would have obtained the evidence eventually without the aid of the suspect's statements.