4 ms·
In this case you could make the argument that it's the right thing to do because it's (I'm assuming) what you would want done to yourself.
by willurd 13y ago
In this case you could make the argument that it's the right thing to do because it's (I'm assuming) what you would want done to yourself.
- cinquemb 13y agoYes, i'd gladly bend over and lubricate my own orifices for sacrifice to the State™ to tort its own laws in the hopes that in the future it will set a precedent for future generations to cope with more of the same :D /sarc
- willurd 13y agoYour sarcasm is duly noted, sir.
- cema 13y agoYou know, whatever works. If we agree it's a moral thing to do, the origin of the morality is less important. Philosophy can be debated... in a different thread.
- willurd 13y agoMorality is such a loaded word, which is why I didn't use it. But yes, another day, another thread.
- cinquemb 13y ago"whatever works." Well if the State™ has to circumvent it's own laws to achieve some ends (which i doubt are really ends since incidents like this will continue to happen), one could argue that grounds for morality are null and void. After all, that's what Terrorists™ do.
- glhaynes 13y agoJust FYI - the little ™ thing doesn't help your arguments be heard. Just the opposite. See also, people who write "Micro$oft".
- cinquemb 13y agoI recognize that, but i also recognize that people who are devout in their beliefs have little reason to think otherwise (it is a belief after all), so in the end i do it anyway for my own laughs :P