3 ms·
That looks really horrible and I am somewhat tempted to write and publish a GreaseMonkey script that does bad things to CipherCloud protected pages...
by danbruc 14y ago
That looks really horrible and I am somewhat tempted to write and publish a GreaseMonkey script that does bad things to CipherCloud protected pages...
- sergiotapia 14y agoWhy would you (or anyone) deliberately try to hurt a company? Just because their tech is not 'on par'? Please think about how it would hurt that company and the employees (and their families!).
- danbruc 14y agoWhy would a company (deliberately) try to sell a false sense of security to anyone whose knowledge of cryptography is not 'on par'? Please think about how it might hurt these customers and their employees (and their families!).
- mappu 14y agoIt's not about deliberately hurting a company; if it's possible to make such a script, it will be made. Period. The question is: do you want the script publicly available, or in the hands of your adversaries without anyone knowing? There's a third alternative: fix the problem.
- puivert 14y agoExposing charlatans is commonly accepted. Elsewhere in the thread it was implied they hold peoples medical data (hipaa).
- qb45 14y agoI guess it's not about hurting a company but about hurting fraudsters. Their tech isn't "not on par" - it's pure nonsense and they know it.
- PeterisP 14y agoFraudster companies SHOULD be hurt. And their employees should have been the ones that bring this to light - otherwise, they are accomplices and deserve whatever they get.