2 ms·
I can rephrase. Google releases their billions of NGrams. They did so because they knew that it would scare anyone from competing. Not because they thought it w
by drakaal 14y ago
I can rephrase. Google releases their billions of NGrams. They did so because they knew that it would scare anyone from competing. Not because they thought it would help. They aren't that nice.
Will I ever share? Possibly. But like Google it will likely be when I have a competitive advantage. I don't not share because I'm mean. I keep things close because as someone on the thread mentioned that they are competing if I published all the information you mention, then Google would build what I have built and we'd be out of business.
Those brain mapping projects aren't done purely for the good of mankind they are trying to make money and get funding. My goals are the same.
- sinkasapa 14y agoI wasn't implying that there was anything wrong with making money, just that if you're claiming that you're leaving the scientific study of language in the dust and insulting the people working in that field, it seems a little strange at the same time to not publish your insights. If you're competing with scientists, you kind of have to produce science, right? You made great software but why insult people working toward the understanding of language? Be more specific with what particular linguists you're talking about if you have a beef with someone. Why insult an entire discipline if you aren't even taking part in the discussion by publishing?