2 ms·
Agree. Pursuing your Morrison analogy: so many artistic and literary figures are similarly hard to characterize. Polarizing their colleagues and fans, causing
by mturmon 14y ago
Agree. Pursuing your Morrison analogy: so many artistic and literary figures are similarly hard to characterize. Polarizing their colleagues and fans, causing denunciations, feuds, embarrassment. Difficult to compare to anyone (i.e., outliers, as you say). Think of someone like Norman Mailer, or Gore Vidal. These people are not role models!
They don't have to be that way, but it's a lot more likely.
After they are gone, asking "were they a good person" is usually not the right question (unless you were close to them).
If you know them mainly through their work, the right question is, "do you value their work?" Here's the relevant quote from Auden:
Time that with this strange excuse
Pardoned Kipling and his views,
And will pardon Paul Claudel,
Pardons him for writing well.
- exodust 14y agoSince when does taking drugs and going to heaps of parties, writing classic songs, performing in a band, learning and playing instruments, reading and studying literature, singing, having lots of sex, writing poetry, recording albums, and inspiring millions make someone a "bad person". Just in case anyone is unclear, the answer to the question "was Jim Morrison a good person" is YES.