I see this statistic and think it makes the stated reasoning even less logical. From the article: "people are more productive when they're alone," and then st

I see this statistic and think it makes the stated reasoning even less logical. From the article: "people are more productive when they're alone," and then stressed "but they're more collaborative and innovative when they're together. Some of the best ideas come from pulling two different ideas together." Really? 200 of 12,000 people were the difference between a collaborative environment and a non-collaborative one? I am willing to accept that their reasons may have been good, and may work for them. I simply disagree with virtually everything that they have chosen to describe as their reasoning.