4 ms·

> Staying home with children to avoid the cost of a full-time nanny is a common reason for telecommuting. I'm not sure I understand your point. Could you pleas

> Staying home with children to avoid the cost of a full-time nanny is a common reason for telecommuting. I'm not sure I understand your point. Could you please elaborate? How does working from home avoid the cost of a full-time nanny? If I work when I'm at home then I can't, by definition, take care of my children at the same time. Assuming a minimal commute, working from home doesn't save hardly any time at all.

signed0 14y ago
I would imagine that taking care of one's children does not require constant interaction. If that is the case then one could WFH for 8 hours a day but space out their time so that they can attend to their children's needs as they arise.
- bjelkeman-again 14y ago
  Depends very much on the age of the children. A friend has three, 6-10 years. It is not so easy to work from home when they are five or less. Try with someone else's kids and you will see.
leecGoimik7 14y ago
It's quite simple: school ends at 3pm. Somebody needs to pick up the kid. After that my 6 yo is perfectly capable of entertaining herself for few hours while I continue my work. And why would you assume minimal commute? For me that's 2.5 h a day, and that's not a lot by NYC metro area standards.
drcube 14y ago
We're not talking about babies here. My six year old can take care of himself just fine if he's fed and has an adult around in case of emergencies. I have worked in my home office for hours while he played in the rest of the house, watched videos, etc. Daycare can be $500/week, for the privilege of simply having an adult be near my kid. If telecommuting helps me avoid that cost, it's a significant incentive.
- chollida1 14y ago
  Hmm, then I guess your kids are better behaved than mine:) I've tried this and it was so disastrous that I'd never let an employee do this. There is just no way you can get proper work done if you are responsible for looking after any kid under the age of 12:) I agree it may save money and time but I've never seen anyone not have it affect their work. You must be a rare individual:)
  - rayiner 14y ago
    > I've tried this and it was so disastrous that I'd never let an employee do this. It's not your employees' fault you didn't raise your children properly. Kids in Asia are doing hard manual labor on a farm at 7 or 8. They can definitely keep quiet and entertain themselves at that age.
    - homosaur 14y ago
      Fairly certain having 7 or 8 year old kids doing hard farm labor is "raising them properly." More like "desperate poverty."
      - rayiner 14y ago
        My point is that for the majority of human history, 7 and 8 year olds were expected to do things that were a lot more intense than simply not bugging their parents for a few hours at a time while they did office work. They aren't constitutionally incapable of it, and OP shouldn't make assumptions about the upbringing of his employee's kids.
    - infinite8s 14y ago
      Wow, that's a bit harsh. It can also depend on the personality of the child. Some kids like to have more attention.
      - _chrismccreadie 14y ago
        Agreed, every child is different. What is the definition of properly and at what point does a child reach that state? The poster has minimised a complex parent -> child relationship to a a binary state of being raised properly or not.
5555624 14y ago
> If I work when I'm at home then I can't, by definition, take care of my children at the same time. Our telework policy spells that out and working from home to avoid child care is not allowed. I'm not sure how strictly they enforce this -- I don't have kids -- but then they also only allow us to telework one, maybe two, days per week.
hkarthik 14y ago
Anyone who's ever been at home with a child between the ages of 0-7 knows they pretty much need constant attention. Maybe you can put older ones in front of the TV and get them to a vegetated state while you write code for an hour or two at most. Doing it occasionally with a sick child is understandable if it's a rare occurrence. I've done this quite often, but even then I'm always playing catch up at night after they go to bed. It wouldn't be sustainable every day.

signed0 14y ago

I would imagine that taking care of one's children does not require constant interaction. If that is the case then one could WFH for 8 hours a day but space out their time so that they can attend to their children's needs as they arise.

bjelkeman-again 14y ago
Depends very much on the age of the children. A friend has three, 6-10 years. It is not so easy to work from home when they are five or less. Try with someone else's kids and you will see.

leecGoimik7 14y ago

It's quite simple: school ends at 3pm. Somebody needs to pick up the kid. After that my 6 yo is perfectly capable of entertaining herself for few hours while I continue my work. And why would you assume minimal commute? For me that's 2.5 h a day, and that's not a lot by NYC metro area standards.

drcube 14y ago

We're not talking about babies here. My six year old can take care of himself just fine if he's fed and has an adult around in case of emergencies. I have worked in my home office for hours while he played in the rest of the house, watched videos, etc. Daycare can be $500/week, for the privilege of simply having an adult be near my kid. If telecommuting helps me avoid that cost, it's a significant incentive.

chollida1 14y ago
Hmm, then I guess your kids are better behaved than mine:) I've tried this and it was so disastrous that I'd never let an employee do this. There is just no way you can get proper work done if you are responsible for looking after any kid under the age of 12:) I agree it may save money and time but I've never seen anyone not have it affect their work. You must be a rare individual:)
- rayiner 14y ago
  > I've tried this and it was so disastrous that I'd never let an employee do this. It's not your employees' fault you didn't raise your children properly. Kids in Asia are doing hard manual labor on a farm at 7 or 8. They can definitely keep quiet and entertain themselves at that age.
  - homosaur 14y ago
    Fairly certain having 7 or 8 year old kids doing hard farm labor is "raising them properly." More like "desperate poverty."
    - rayiner 14y ago
      My point is that for the majority of human history, 7 and 8 year olds were expected to do things that were a lot more intense than simply not bugging their parents for a few hours at a time while they did office work. They aren't constitutionally incapable of it, and OP shouldn't make assumptions about the upbringing of his employee's kids.
  - infinite8s 14y ago
    Wow, that's a bit harsh. It can also depend on the personality of the child. Some kids like to have more attention.
    - _chrismccreadie 14y ago
      Agreed, every child is different. What is the definition of properly and at what point does a child reach that state? The poster has minimised a complex parent -> child relationship to a a binary state of being raised properly or not.

5555624 14y ago

> If I work when I'm at home then I can't, by definition, take care of my children at the same time. Our telework policy spells that out and working from home to avoid child care is not allowed. I'm not sure how strictly they enforce this -- I don't have kids -- but then they also only allow us to telework one, maybe two, days per week.

hkarthik 14y ago

Anyone who's ever been at home with a child between the ages of 0-7 knows they pretty much need constant attention. Maybe you can put older ones in front of the TV and get them to a vegetated state while you write code for an hour or two at most. Doing it occasionally with a sick child is understandable if it's a rare occurrence. I've done this quite often, but even then I'm always playing catch up at night after they go to bed. It wouldn't be sustainable every day.