2 ms·

I wasn't considering "smart" interpolation methods, I was assuming the best available interpolation was already implemented in Chrome. I think it would load fas

I wasn't considering "smart" interpolation methods, I was assuming the best available interpolation was already implemented in Chrome. I think it would load faster with client-side interpolation actually, 17 MB takes a long time on most connections. But I don't see why client-side can't do "powerful resizing". Not since <canvas> appeared, anyway.

coldtea 14y ago
>I think it would load faster with client-side interpolation actually, 17 MB takes a long time on most connections. You'd still have to move the 5-6 MB original, and then it would hog a lot of people's browsers to work on the image in the canvas (depending on client CPU/memory). >But I don't see why client-side can't do "powerful resizing". Not since <canvas> appeared, anyway. Who said it cannot do? I said the options aren't available. The guy did a simple resize. Should he also spend hours coding smart interpolation on javascript instead of just putting the image up? For most connections, a 17MB download is eaten for breakfast, anyway.