4 ms·
Baidu is making a Google Glass knockoff
- sidcool 13y agoSo they are cloning everything that Google does. Clone a Larry Page, may be.
- jkldotio 13y agoNear enough[1][2]. [1]http://www.vice.com/read/chinas-taking-over-the-world-with-a-massive-genetic-engineering-program http://www.vice.com/read/chinas-taking-over-the-world-with-a... [2]http://io9.com/is-china-selectively-breeding-a-new-generation-of-geniu-455634018 http://io9.com/is-china-selectively-breeding-a-new-generatio...
- danso 13y agoInteresting to see if the concept, in a social sense, will face more or less of a backlash than Glass in the states...will a country that has purportedly more government surveillance be more open to the idea of a device that inevitably leads to surveillance on a personal scale?
- ultimoo 13y agoI heard about this from a friend earlier today. However, while reading this, I found the concluding piece very interesting and it quite changed the way I was thinking about Baidu. I mean, if Glass is successful, everyone is going to clone it anyway like they did it with smartphones, tablets, ultrabooks, and even gaming consoles. Baidu is just doing it earlier.
- eridius 13y ago> Anything that looks like it could be the next big thing attracts a crowd of copycats. Take, for example, Google Glass. A much better example here would be the mythical Apple iWatch. Google's been talking up Glass for a while now, so it's not surprising that someone else would be interested in doing the same thing. But the iWatch? Pure rumor and speculation, and yet we're already hearing that other companies such as Samsung and Microsoft are seriously considering making a smartwatch in response.
- seferphier 13y agoif the mythical iWatch has a 10% probability to have the impact as iPhone and iPod it is worth trying. it is a much better strategy than waiting for Apple to release and copy them- only to realize that Apple's iPad pricing is much lower than predicted.
- seferphier 13y agoThere is a lot of hate on copying. There is nothing wrong with copying as long as it is the right thing to do. If the world is moving to the direction of Google glasses, it would be insane not to copy. The question is whether copying is their long term strategy, which would mean that they are constantly being reactive to the market. In some industries, a wait and acquire approach is better like pharmaceutical industry since R&D is so expensive. This does not seem to work well in high tech industries but baidu (by being in china) is more insulated than other companies in the US or Europe. I hope that Google glass would be a lesson to all to put innovation to the heart of their company's strategy.
- OGinparadise 13y agoThe report’s details only accentuate the slavish copying. Using your voice to control the glasses and search the web? Check. Gesture control? Baidu totally has that too. To be a devil's advocate: how else are you going to control the glasses if not by voice and gesture? Of course it remains to be seen how /if it copied as a design but many companies have worked and are working on computerized glasses. IIRC, Microsoft and Apple also filed patents. Microsoft filed them in 2011 according to http://phandroid.com/2012/11/24/microsoft-patents-google-project-glass/ http://phandroid.com/2012/11/24/microsoft-patents-google-pro...
- Achshar 13y agoApparently everyone and their mother is making a Glass type product, or so the rumors say. I have a feeling this is not like iPhone and smartphones. Smartphones had a huge potential market, but this kind of product has a niche market, at least until the use of product is clear to the mainstream.
- ernesth 13y agoIs the use of tablets clear to the "mainstream"? I still do not know precisely what they're for but their market proved to be far from a niche.
- Achshar 13y agoTablets are simply post PC device. Mostly for media consumption/internet browsing. Two very mainstream things. None of glass's uses are obvious/popular.
- Rhapso 13y agoYay! This is a good sign. It indicates a lot of things: that the HUD style glasses have been deemed viable in a commercial sense, that availability of the technology will be better then what Google has shown previously (Nexus(es) I am looking at you) and even more importantly it will drive down costs on the screens and bone-induction drivers to allow even more entrance to the market. For the most part "clones" are a good sign and help the market grow by increasing potential market size and decreasing costs of components.