> "One suspect in Monday’s Boston Marathon bombings has been captured, according to an official with knowledge of the investigation. Another remains on the loos

> "One suspect in Monday’s Boston Marathon bombings has been captured, according to an official with knowledge of the investigation. Another remains on the loose in Watertown after a firefight with police." > "an apparent carjacking led police on a wild chase into Watertown" > "Authorities would not comment on whether the events were connected to Monday’s Boston Marathon bombings." > "The FBI source said early Friday it is “too early to speculate” on a relation to the Marathon bombing." Maybe I'm just terrible at reading between the lines, but this paints a fuzzy picture. Both the headline and the opening paragraph basically state that this incident is related to the marathon bombing. However, the article then goes on to describe a carjacking as well as multiple "we-don't-know-for-sure" disclaimers. While the presence of explosives certainly does significantly reduce the possibility of this being run of the mill urban crime, I guess I wish news outlets would temper themselves a little by not reporting speculation as fact.