3 ms·
Does the co-founder term always imply some sort of equality? If so, I think the implication is dangerous. For example, finding someone who works exactly as hard
by sreitshamer 14y ago
Does the co-founder term always imply some sort of equality? If so, I think the implication is dangerous. For example, finding someone who works exactly as hard as you do is impossible, so someone's always going to be disappointed.
Also, the buck has to stop somewhere, at an individual, not a committee. It's lonely at the top.
- _delirium 14y agoI've generally found that the best case is the buck stopping at a smallish committee (2-4 people) who work well together, take joint responsibility, and appropriately communicate and split expertise. Individuals have a lot of blind spots and tend to get either overwhelmed or overconfident. But it's also true that the "work well together" part has a high failure rate.