4 ms·
it would be nice to see a 2.0 vs 1.9 bench on FF/Chrome/IE9+, much more interested in that than a non-noticeable 11k size reduction for the end user (maybe only
by leeoniya 14y ago
it would be nice to see a 2.0 vs 1.9 bench on FF/Chrome/IE9+, much more interested in that than a non-noticeable 11k size reduction for the end user (maybe only slightly noticeable on very slow mobile).
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- monkeynotes 14y agoYeah, I was also scratching my head as to the 'performance' gains. Even if jQuery 2.0 has computational benchmark gains they also are likely insignificant in proper context.
- byroot 14y agoI found this one: http://jsperf.com/jquery-1-7-2-vs-jquery-1-8/29 http://jsperf.com/jquery-1-7-2-vs-jquery-1-8/29 2.0 is slightly faster on every measures.