3 ms·
> Ironically NY Post was one of the "news" sources Just as the WSJ published about people in custody, the lesson is clear: Do not bother listening to any Rupe
by jpdoctor 14y ago
> Ironically NY Post was one of the "news" sources
Just as the WSJ published about people in custody, the lesson is clear: Do not bother listening to any Rupert Murdock publication for news.
The WSJ should just stick to finance, and the NYP should stick to whatever it is that it does well. (Remind me: What was it that the NYP does well?)
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- e40 14y agothe lesson is clear: Do not bother listening to any Rupert Murdock publication for news. Amen. Everyone, just refuse to follow a link to a Murdock website. Daily Mail. NY Post. WSJ. Are there others?
- cypherpunks01 14y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corporation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_C...
- brewdad 14y agoMurdoch Block extension for Chrome works well. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/murdoch-block/moepiacmhnmbiilhpojodnaopndhddpg?utm_source=chrome-ntp-icon https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/murdoch-block/moep...
- desas 14y agoThe daily mail is worth ignoring, it is nothing to do with Rupert Murdoch though - it is mainly owned by Viscount Rothermere