> This time you've told everyone such-and-such isn't in the README when it is I clearly demonstrated all the deficiencies of the current distribution, especial

> This time you've told everyone such-and-such isn't in the README when it is I clearly demonstrated all the deficiencies of the current distribution, especially in regards to running the same programs (with the same arguments) as those on the website. your explanation of the commandline variables was missing from the readme reference to the actual location of the ini file (my.linux.ini). I expect a section like this: The bencher is configured with an INI file. There are two example ini files included with the distribution: my.linux.ini and my.win32.ini, located in the "makefiles" directory. this can't be found anywhere in the distribution: The ini files from the game website can be found in the nanobench/makefiles directory: <listing of the files> Then I will agree that the documentation is complete, and that the process to run your own benchmarks is almost "easy". If you separate the configuration files, organize the directories more appropriately and write a more condensed README that skips the condescending act towards the user, then I will agree that running your own benchmarks is easy. > Did you ask for help? I wouldn't have had to ask for help if the documentation was complete and adequate. I will however check out the tarball tomorrow. Oh and what about the suggestion to separate the environment configuration from the programs configuration? No comment, I guess...