3 ms·
This seems to be a harmless case of erroneous old information slipping in because it was not stricken from all maps many years ago. However, it is not unusual f
by a_p 13y ago
This seems to be a harmless case of erroneous old information slipping in because it was not stricken from all maps many years ago. However, it is not unusual for many maps to all contain the same mistake. Cartographers have been known to include small mistakes in their maps to catch people who copy their work. In the past, even if another cartographer found information on a map to be inaccurate, they would not always correct it completely, for similar reasons to why the value of the charge of an electron in Millikan oil drop experiment took years to correct.
- pc86 13y agoGoogle did something similar to prove that Bing was just copying SERPs if I remember correctly.
- scottru 13y agoThat's right - they seeded nonsense queries with very specific results. Working assumption is that Bing was integrating clickstream data (either from ISPs or from the MSN Toolbar) into their results. http://www.wired.com/business/2011/02/bing-copies-google/ http://www.wired.com/business/2011/02/bing-copies-google/