3 ms·
It's funny that you mention Qwest (Now CenturyLink), and the illegal spying program, because they (along with AT&T) are brokering access to the NSA's latest spy
by lawnchair_larry 14y ago
It's funny that you mention Qwest (Now CenturyLink), and the illegal spying program, because they (along with AT&T) are brokering access to the NSA's latest spying toy, which CISPA is intended to expand.
http://www.dc3.mil/dcise/DIB%20Enhanced%20Cybersecurity%20Services%20Procedures.pdf http://www.dc3.mil/dcise/DIB%20Enhanced%20Cybersecurity%20Se...
This DIB Enhanced Cybersecurity Service is being handled by the defense contractors who donate to Mike Rogers:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2012&type=C&cid=N00009668&newMem=N&recs=20 http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=201...
4. AT&T
8. General Dynamics
9. Raytheon
9. SAIC Inc
9. Lockheed Martin
9. Northrop Grumman
19. BAE Systems
Their letters of support for CISPA, referencing the DIB program, are on the Senate website:
http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/NDIASupportofCyberBill.pdf http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/f...
I write to you on behalf of the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) to express our support for The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (HR 3523). ... As you are aware, NDIA is a non-profit organization, and is America's leading Defense Industry association, ... Our members represent the entire spectrum of the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). ... To illustrate, some NDIA members have participated in the Department of Defense's DIB Pilot program...
http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/ASISLetterSupportingHR3523.pdf http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/f...
ASIS
...
The bill also gives businesses certainty that cybersecurity information shared with the government would be provided safe harbor and would not lead to frivolous lawsuits, among other protections.
http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/CSC113011.pdf http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/f...
"I am please to write to you to express CSC's wholehearted endorsement of the "Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011" which you released today and which requires the Director of National Intelligence to establish a program allowing certified organizations to use classified cyber signatures to help protect their IT enterprises...
As you know, CSC was the first IT enterprise company invited to join the defense industrial base pilot program (DIB)...
This program was quietly started around 2011:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/major-internet-service-providers-cooperating-with-nsa-on-monitoring-traffic/2011/06/07/AG2dukXH_story.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/major-internet-servic...
NSA allies with Internet carriers to thwart cyber attacks against defense firms
The National Security Agency is working with Internet service providers to deploy a new generation of tools to scan e-mail and other digital traffic with the goal of thwarting cyberattacks against defense firms by foreign adversaries...
The Internet carriers are AT&T, Verizon and CenturyLink. Together they are seeking to filter the traffic of 15 defense contractors, including Lockheed, CSC, SAIC and Northrop Grumman.
There is at least $6B waiting to go to the defense contractors to help the NSA. (They're already working with the NSA on the big Utah datacenter):
ttp://www.bizjournals.com/washington/blog/fedbiz_daily/2013/01/northrop-saic-mantech-among-those-to.html?page=all
Northrop, SAIC, ManTech among those to bid for DHS' $6B cyber program
Northrop Grumman Corp., ManTech International Corp. and SAIC all confirmed to me their plans to bid as a prime contractor for DHS' Continuous Monitoring as a Service program, which will be worth up to $6 billion over five years
- tptacek 14y agoI am confused. Why are you opposed to the USG spending money on protecting defense information transiting private-sector networks because of private-sector contractors? You strike me as the kind of person who would be irritated that information was being insecurely shared between DOD and (say) Lockheed to begin with.
- lawnchair_larry 14y agoYou mean why am I opposed to blanket legal protection for ISPs to quietly share my packets with the NSA and their contractors? Why am I annoyed that everybody behind CISPA is participating in a charade, when we could just cut to the point and debate the merits and concerns regarding the project motivating it? Why am I annoyed that we don't get a voice in this, and the companies receiving the billion dollar contracts for this specific bill, who also fund the politicians putting it through, do? Why am I annoyed that attempts were made to amend the bill to actually almost fit what you're claiming it is for, by protecting customer payload data, and they were shot down? I am confused about why you aren't. I feel like you've been stuck in anti-rageview mode when it was first said that this was about copyright issues, and you over-committed to that position, and that you normally wouldn't support this.
- Torgo 14y agoI have worked directly with one of the bidders, won't say which or in what capacity. As far as I'm concerned, this will result in six billion dollars thrown right into a hole, with no enhancement to "cybersecurity." I don't expect anybody to take my statement seriously since I provided no evidence, but I for one now see this as a giant waste of fucking money.
- tptacek 14y agoI have absolutely no trouble believing that this is going to be a giant waste of money.
- hkmurakami 14y agoHaving seen what a mess TSA has made of "security improvements", I have no problem believing your claims.