Point 1: We understood the argument, we just felt that was a ridiculously problematic Rube Goldberg solution that has serious negative repercussions. I wouldn'

Point 1: We understood the argument, we just felt that was a ridiculously problematic Rube Goldberg solution that has serious negative repercussions. I wouldn't want to take strategic direction from somebody who thought it was the best way forward. Point 2: You directly stated that not wanting to work for bigots is the same as employment discrimination. That's a moronic argument. If you think your most exciting possible opportunity is to go work for a homophobic bigot, then go ahead, nobody is stopping you, but don't piss on people who have more than one opportunity. too many words got in the way of the point No. You just have an incredibly naive position... and you're being incredibly rude to those who disagree with utterly insane positions. It's disgusting that you compare not wanting to work for a woman to not wanting to work for a bigoted asshole. I can't even begin to fathom what made you think that was a reasonable argument to make. But I assume whatever broken made you think that was okay is also what keeps you from realizing that it was a stupid point... no need for further replies, at this point we understand that you're an idiotic blowhard who supports bigotry, and insults those who don't.