3 ms·
I thought the veto was because the bill was too lenient on companies. "However, the Administration is concerned about the broad scope of liability limitations
by okamiueru 14y ago
I thought the veto was because the bill was too lenient on companies.
"However, the Administration is concerned about the broad scope of liability limitations in H.R. 624. Specifically, even if there is no clear intent to do harm, the law should not immunize a failure to take reasonable measures, such as the sharing of information, to prevent harm when and if the entity knows that such inaction will cause damage or otherwise injure or endanger other entities or individuals." [http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57579905-38/obama-threatens-veto-of-cispa-database-sharing-bill/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57579905-38/obama-threaten...]
In other words, that corporations should be punished for not providing information.