Here we go with you again, tptacek. I have far fewer karma than you, and have been on HN far fewer days, but I'm not stupid. And I know that your hypocrisy on

Here we go with you again, tptacek. I have far fewer karma than you, and have been on HN far fewer days, but I'm not stupid. And I know that your hypocrisy on every single HN post regarding CISPA is reaching an intolerable level. Your rhetoric is flawed at a very basic level -- you claim that the EFF and other institutions are not telling you the complete truth about the bill and advocate it with such ferocity, yet, even you fail to present valid arguments. You use smoke-and-mirrors tactics to distract readers from the real point -- which is not whether anti-CISPA institutions are telling you "the whole truth" -- but whether CISPA infringes on the Fourth Amendment. The bill has loopholes, and the traditional unclear and tangled legalese that is all too prevalent in bills such as these only ensures there will be more to come. Sometimes a vocal majority can be wrong. But that doesn't mean you should discredit their rhetoric, because it's valuable. If we all did what you said, we would be likely still be living in monarchical England.