4 ms·

I think it's a completely fair interpretation of what you wrote. The guy is a bigot. He worked to ensure that a class of people had fewer rights than other cl

I think it's a completely fair interpretation of what you wrote. The guy is a bigot. He worked to ensure that a class of people had fewer rights than other classes of people. If that doesn't make you a bigot, I don't know what does. I'm disappointed that you wasted our time with that completely ridiculous argument. That said, thanks for letting me know that if I ever take a morally abhorrent position on something, you'll be there to say I'm a great guy, and that even if I'm not, people should still work for me. (though even in that world, I think it's baffling that you managed to attack people who don't want to work for a bigot as being somehow bigoted...)

Raven_Trickster 13y ago
To derail this a little: There's every chance that donating $8,000 to a cause was not about Gay Anything, and he was supporting a cause of someone he wanted to butter up / chat with / get into the table with. Trust me: the "tipping culture" goes way beyond DC & lobbyists. Corruption: for when donating to a cause to get favor gets a LGBT response. Shitty PR, and probably deserves it for currying favor with <subject X> but really not that uncommon. Boo! Politics is dirty; reeeeal dirty.
- mkopinsky 13y ago
  If so, he's corrupt instead of bigoted. Doesn't (materially) change whether someone would want to work with the guy.