Your inability to stop your car is very, very unlikely to kill enough people to affect society. If by "endangering society", you only meant "endangering at lea

Your inability to stop your car is very, very unlikely to kill enough people to affect society. If by "endangering society", you only meant "endangering at least one person other than the person without brakes", then we're just talking past each other. > Replace "learning disability" with "using windows" or "being black" or "growing up an orphan" and your argument still holds true. Its just a generality on life, not a rational legal argument. I don't think "using windows" fits here, but in any case, if there were someone to blame, legally, for those other things, then perhaps we'd see suits about them (and I suppose we might already in the case of orphans suing whoever could be legally blamed for the death of their parents, but I don't know of any examples offhand). I don't know that the kid actually has (well, should have) any standing to sue, since they wouldn't exist without the actions that were taken, except possibly in the event that the sperm or egg was damaged by the defendant, rather than merely being selected in error by the defendant.