4 ms·
Not really. Current residential electric rate here is 0.0541$/kWh, compared to 0.232$/kWh in LA. I am sure they would enjoy having this cheap electricity, but t
by jfim 14y ago
Not really. Current residential electric rate here is 0.0541$/kWh, compared to 0.232$/kWh in LA. I am sure they would enjoy having this cheap electricity, but they're too far from here.
Furthermore, to take his example of solar electricity from the Sahara to the UK, the line of sight distance between both is over 3000km[1], includes underwater segments and is more than 25% longer than the longest HVDC link(the Rio Madeira, at 2375km).
Can electricity be sent over long distances? Sure, but not intercontinentally, or even intracontinentally if you're looking at, say, New York to Los Angeles.
[1] http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=distance+between+the+sahara+desert+and+london%2C+uk http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=distance+between+the+sa...
- maxerickson 14y agoI take the existence of the interlink as evidence that it lowers prices (this seems like a reasonable definition of profit here). Maybe it only works due to the regulatory situation in California. It would take some more information to decide how much of the price difference is due to the interlink. I don't particularly think intercontinental systems are in the near future, but I don't think "a little pessimistic" was outlandish. What if ABB can push their tech 50% further?