3 ms·
> Isn't this part of peer-review? iirc, the paper wasn't published, let alone peer-reviewed. it was "discovered" and used as a justification by people who may
by makr17 14y ago
> Isn't this part of peer-review?
iirc, the paper wasn't published, let alone peer-reviewed. it was "discovered" and used as a justification by people who may or may not understand the deeper issues involved.
- sirclueless 14y agoThat's not true, it was published in the American Economic Review, which is apparently a very well-respected journal. http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?hs=1&fnd=s&doi=10.1257/aer.100.2.573 http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?hs=1&fnd=s&doi=10...
- ukapu 14y agoI believe it was published in a section of the journal that does not require peer-review.