4 ms·
It probably feels to them like GitHub is so well known that the company needs to be called that. I think they're actually early enough on that they could just m
by staunch 14y ago
It probably feels to them like GitHub is so well known that the company needs to be called that. I think they're actually early enough on that they could just make it one of their products.
SocialCoding, Inc.
/ | \
GitHub ??? ???
- TazeTSchnitzel 14y agoI'd prefer: OctoCat Enterprises, Inc. / | \ GitHub ??? ???
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- robert-boehnke 14y agoThey actually went down the opposite path, changing their company name from Logical Awesome to GitHub See https://github.com/blog/589-new-year-new-company https://github.com/blog/589-new-year-new-company
- staunch 14y agoWell, it's pretty common to have a generic name for your corporation. No one but their lawyers ever really knew about that name. I'm saying that I think they could actually build a corporate brand separate from GitHub.