> Buyer's willing to mark the whole transaction as terrible over a freaking dollar? Why not? The proper course of action (provided the buyer didn’t mind waitin

> Buyer's willing to mark the whole transaction as terrible over a freaking dollar? Why not? The proper course of action (provided the buyer didn’t mind waiting for the delivery) would have been to reject paying said $1.44 and let the seller try to ship again. By then, the delivery certainly would have been late, easily justifying negative feedback. Furthermore, the seller even acknowledges that this particular problem happened a lot lately[1], so they really have no excuse whatsoever for underpaying their shipments. Oh, and it may be a good idea to think about what ‘-’ means – to me, it doesn’t mean ‘terrible’ but ‘there was a problem’, and postage due is a problem (as is late delivery). I don’t want to buy from people who deliver late/with postage due and I am happy if ebay ensures that people delivering late or trying to get another $1.44 from me are stopped from selling on the platform. [1] http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=med_express_sales&iid=-1&de=off&items=25&which=negative&interval=180&_trkparms=negative_180 http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&... ‘Sorry- no idea there was postage due. This has happened alot from USPS lately.’.