3 ms·
This is going off track. My original argument is: 1) The US is a target. 2) The reason it's a target is not what I'm debating. 3) Terrorists are not having tro
by MichaelApproved 14y ago
This is going off track. My original argument is:
1) The US is a target.
2) The reason it's a target is not what I'm debating.
3) Terrorists are not having trouble attacking the US because they are dumb, as the author stated.
4) Terrorists are experimenting with different ways to attack the US and are evolving.
5) The author of the article is mistaking these experiments with stupidity.
6) The ocean is an obstacle that won't protect the US forever.