2 ms·
FTA: > "The typical study had a power of just 21%. In other words, it has a 79% chance of failing to spot a real effect." > "Neuroimaging studies which used M
by carbocation 14y ago
FTA:
> "The typical study had a power of just 21%. In other words, it has a 79% chance of failing to spot a real effect."
> "Neuroimaging studies which used MRI scanners to measure brain volume had a power of just 8%."
This just tells us that most negative findings in neuroscience are uninformative. It doesn't really bear on the positive findings.