4 ms·
I don't see a problem with that. No DRM in HTML5. People are demanding less horrible web standards (flash must die!), and we watch the tension build until somet
by GhotiFish 14y ago
I don't see a problem with that. No DRM in HTML5. People are demanding less horrible web standards (flash must die!), and we watch the tension build until something catastrophically breaks. Something HAS to break.
Aren't you willing to play chicken? I am.
- fungi 14y agoThey are a single company operating in a single market... they don't offer to sell me any product and i have no interest in what they have... i and people like me make up the vast vast vast majority of the the internets population. So we don't even get an opportunity to play chicken... google and netflix will break the net and shove this shit down our throat regardless. Why should we the vast majority of the Internet give a shit about their precious hollywood contracts?
- dthunt 14y agoI am willing to play chicken. Flash must die, and more than that, the standards should make no additional allowances for broken behavior, such as allowing websites to discriminate between Platform A and Platform B. In practice, as long as Javascript remains in its present form, they will be able to effect this sort of discrimination, but the W3C doesn't need to actively promote brokenness.