4 ms·
Thanks for the update Carter. I'll root for you. one point to make. The interface and the performance don't have to appear at once. The interface will be the l
by spitfire 14y ago
Thanks for the update Carter. I'll root for you.
one point to make. The interface and the performance don't have to appear at once. The interface will be the longer lived portion. So sort that out, and you can focus on performance as problems crop up.
I know it's horribly boring to say, but getting those
first few customers gets you into a virtuous cycle. Given that you're bootstrapped, even a few customers will get you in a very good place, where you can spend on development.
I remember us (or rather I) talking about Mathematica. When it first came out it was horrible for numerics. Truly terrible. But it was easy to transfer technical papers to. You simply wrote down what was on the paper, and you were done.
So people used it, and eventually performance got better over time as they invested in it.
- carterschonwald 14y agoAgree with everything you say. Hence why I'm just going to be releasing the Lin alg soon. It actually turns out for the linear algebra code done right, the API has an intimate relationship with the possible performance! (This will be more apparent once I get things out the door). There's a lot ill not be even trying to do in the first release : eg parallelism, distributed computation, sse/avx intrinsics. Fret not, things are moving apace, and basic tech validation and thence conditioned upon that, public release, are approaching scary fast! :-)