2 ms·
Why should they address criticisms of DRM? They've already decided that they need DRM (or rather, their contracts require it). So, why should they spend the tim
by mbreese 14y ago
Why should they address criticisms of DRM? They've already decided that they need DRM (or rather, their contracts require it). So, why should they spend the time debating the same things over and over again?
From their perspective, the DRM question isn't if, it's how. So, that's what their article is about.
- apendleton 14y agoBut they talk about the "how" (the EME) as a done deal, when they don't seem to be, given Mozilla's opposition; more people will have to be convinced for this to actually work. Besides, everyone knows their proposed "how" already. A blog post that just says want to move to HTML5 delivery using this set of extensions they've already publicly supported for this purpose doesn't add much to the discussion.