Interesting opinion regarding my style. Thanks for explaining. There are many things in the CL spec that are very contentious. Arguably too many. Dan Weinreb po

Interesting opinion regarding my style. Thanks for explaining. There are many things in the CL spec that are very contentious. Arguably too many. Dan Weinreb pointed this out earlier in the week(http://ilc2009.scheming.org/node/7 http://ilc2009.scheming.org/node/7) which inspired a response from me(http://jng.imagine27.com/articles/2009-04-07-135246_cl_hard_to_compile_efficiently.html http://jng.imagine27.com/articles/2009-04-07-135246_cl_hard_...) although not directly related to the "too many concepts, irregular" argument but then again this may effect how per formant/stable code can be written in a language. Yes tail-recursion is not part of the spec along with many other implementation aspects that probably should be.