3 ms·
Regular testing that you'd expect to do many times, and that's part of your product development process, is almost certainly automated. But one-off tests are s
by potatolicious 14y ago
Regular testing that you'd expect to do many times, and that's part of your product development process, is almost certainly automated.
But one-off tests are still squarely in the territory of Ye Poor Intern. I remember interning at an auto parts plant years ago where I spent two whole days stuck in a windowless lab where I laser-measured the precise diameter of a batch of motor shafts because there was suspicion of a defect from the supplier.
It's the sort of mind-numbing repetition and boredom that threatens to liquefy your brain, and to this day gives me a greater appreciation for how good I have it writing code for a living :)
(the fact that I was using frickin' lasers to do my job was novel for only the first half hour)
Certain parts of automated testing are still manual too. In the aforementioned plant I was responsible for going into the oven and making measurements every few hours and measuring hundreds of things as part of the heat-cold cycle testing, even though the actual temperature shifting and vibrational stress was fully computer-controlled.
Good times. Glad I'm in software now.
- hkmurakami 14y agoI have similar experience in an an auto-parts manufacturing setting, where they had tried (and failed) to develop an automated system for their defect testing. However, since the area was "visual defects" and not functional defects (this certain component was in a very eyeball-attracting part of the vehicle cockpit), it was discovered that humans are far more capable than this kind of affair than computer vision at this time.