4 ms·
It is easy in the tech world (and HN is mostly tech) to confidently say 6 months is a long time for unemployment. At the moment, I'm fairly certain I could have
by yasth 13y ago
It is easy in the tech world (and HN is mostly tech) to confidently say 6 months is a long time for unemployment. At the moment, I'm fairly certain I could have interviews in a single digit number of hours, but that isn't true for people who have to compete for "general skills" jobs (i.e. those that require a resume, but no particular special skills, such as receptionists, admin and the like). Also there are a lot of perfectly valid reasons to have a 6 mo gap (the biggest is maternity leave).
Resume blasts are often the only realistic option some people have for getting their candidacy out there. If they had a friend at a firm that was hiring they'd probably have used that before 6 months of unemployment. Unemployment generally means that hanging out with employed friends has to be cut back (because going out for drinks gets expensive). If you network fails you for a few months you might not have much of a network to lean on after that.
Discrimination against 6 Months+ of unemployment certainly has some objective basis. Discrimination isn't always a bad thing. Still there are undoubtedly people swept up into this bias who should not be.
- tptacek 13y agoIf it's true that 6+ month resume gaps have a deleterious effect on job searches, my point would be that this observation is another arrow in the quiver of people (like myself) who believe that women face not just bias but also specific objective structural disadvantages in the workplace, beyond just the career development time they lose directly to child care.
- donaldc 13y agoWomen who choose to have children, and anyone, male or female, who chooses to take more than six months off for just about any reason.