3 ms·
I worked at newsweek and later The Daily Beast as a web developer in charge of analytics, so I can provide some insight into this. The product managers were un
by notjustanymike 14y ago
I worked at newsweek and later The Daily Beast as a web developer in charge of analytics, so I can provide some insight into this.
The product managers were under constant pressure to increase traffic, so they'd add every new feature that appeared in front of them. Facebook, comments, social crap, stock ticker (that -nearly- happened), it didn't matter. Each one of these did add a marginal amount of measurable traffic.
Here's where the analytics part kicks in. The numbers did not reflect that our readers hated all that noise, and the product managers wouldn't dare remove something that generates traffic. So no matter how pointless something was, if it generated traffic it stayed for good.
- laumars 14y agoDid it generate more traffic, or were those extra hits just users tapping "refresh" because of page timeouts when trying to grab the larger sized site on a crappy 3G connection? (joke)
- Kesty 14y agoIt might be a joke, but is real. Adwise, the reason why you have more impression doesn't really matter.