This incident provides a good lesson for anyone here on HN. Mentioning a future action, communication, or practice that could be perceived as negative in your T

This incident provides a good lesson for anyone here on HN. Mentioning a future action, communication, or practice that could be perceived as negative in your TOS isn't enough. Sure, it is done all the time by many organizations. That doesn't mean it is the best way to do it. People just don't read the TOS in most cases. Companies shouldn't be surprised if they hear something about someone being upset or confused by something hidden in a TOS. P.S. CoFoundersLab looks cool. Thanks for having the initiative to start it Shahab.