2 ms·
Well, * if you were a gov't who was consistently on the losing end of problems caused by the current regime, * you'd failed to get relief by diplomacy, * cou
by fnordfnordfnord 14y ago
Well,
* if you were a gov't who was consistently on the losing end of problems caused by the current regime,
* you'd failed to get relief by diplomacy,
* couldn't or wouldn't seek relief by open warfare,
* and didn't mind the remote prospect of making your situation worse,
Why not?
Personally, I don't think a gov't did it. I've always liked Kaminsky's "it's a group of quants" hypothesis. Or maybe Michael Clear. Or maybe some other Physics/CS type. But I really have no idea, and haven't really looked into it more than reading random internet news.