2 ms·
I'm not familiar with their product, is their back-end choice going to limit their customers? I think that a lot of developers that didn't start with front-end
by voidlogic 14y ago
I'm not familiar with their product, is their back-end choice going to limit their customers?
I think that a lot of developers that didn't start with front-end work find Javascript disgusting, maybe this team is in that group. When I worked at a consulting firm (that used a lot of C#) and we talked about node.js when it came out, everyone agreed they hated the idea of having to write more yucky JS than they had too. I think node.js was high on hype for a while and is less loved (esp outside of CA) than you might expect.
I've ported node.js apps to Go 1.0.1 and even back then the result was better performing, used less memory, about the same LOC and IMHO much cleaner, straight-forward and maintainable code.
- cygwin98 14y agoI think they a lot of developers that didn't start with front-end work find Javascript disgusting, maybe this team is in that group. I am not a Javascript fanboy, but the syntax of GoLang is not better either.
- voidlogic 14y agoI disagree, Go is slightly more verbose, but it leads to very clear code that is easily understood. Go code is beautiful. Javascript's dynamic typing, extensive use of callbacks, its approach to OO, inconsistent braces and semicolons, etc are all felt by a lot of people to be messy. For me lack of something like gofmt and a compile time errors also greatly detract.