You should accept that he is 'almost' right. It's true that this technology (as most of them) can be used for spying and terrorist purposes, but regulation is t

You should accept that he is 'almost' right. It's true that this technology (as most of them) can be used for spying and terrorist purposes, but regulation is the worst (and most anti-competitive) way of handling this issue. The article does not mention what kind of regulation, though. One would expect the chairman of a company whose motto was "don't be evil" to ask for awareness and education on the technology instead of regulation.