3 ms·
An article I read said that the police knew whose phone the photo was taken off of, but that they didn't want to arrest anyone because they didn't know whose fi
by mnicole 14y ago
An article I read said that the police knew whose phone the photo was taken off of, but that they didn't want to arrest anyone because they didn't know whose finger pressed the button to actually take it. Just mind-boggling that despite an alleged rape with photo evidence, they wouldn't arrest anyone for distribution of child pornography because they couldn't prove who took the picture. If no one wanted to fess up to it, either let the phone owner take the fall or make them all responsible.
- illuminate 14y ago"Just mind-boggling that despite an alleged rape with photo evidence, they wouldn't arrest anyone for distribution of child pornography because they couldn't prove who took the picture. If no one wanted to fess up to it, either let the phone owner take the fall or make them all responsible." Primary school is not law.
- mnicole 14y agoRight, because all of them were innocent to begin with.
- illuminate 14y agoI fully agree with the horror of their actions and complicity. It's just a bit more complicated and serious than "Who threw the spitball? You're all guilty until one of you fesses up!"
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]