3 ms·
It won't solve the problem. The default response will be to simply refuse to run at all. And, for an app like facebook, which has the upper hand, it is not a bi
by utopkara 14y ago
It won't solve the problem. The default response will be to simply refuse to run at all. And, for an app like facebook, which has the upper hand, it is not a big deal that the user doesn't like it.
- micampe 14y agoOn iOS I can deny permissions one by one: I can deny the Facebook app to access my location, contacts and photos. It runs just fine without all of those.
- timmy-turner 14y agoThere could also be an option to provide the app with fake data instead of telling it to not have any permissions, e.g. an empty address book, empty list of currently running apps, a fake network access which actually routes the data through a proxy and so on.
- bookwormAT 14y ago"There could also be an option to provide the app with fake data instead of telling it to not have any permissions," Some guys from Cyanogen released a proof on concept a while ago. You could install any Android app and select which permissions to "mock". Anyway, I think the permission system in Android makes sense the way it is. It forces app developers to declare what they want to do on you system, but the install process stays simple and straightforward. On Windows and OS X, we used to give every app the "do whatever you want with my computer" permission for years. On Android you risk a shitstorm of bad reviews if you fail to explain the reasoning for permissions to users. And Google can use the permission list and double check apps with critical permissions for malicous behaviour.