4 ms·
i believe you only dealt with the intended usage of the APIs and interfaces? this may be the same as someone that sets up a SCADA to the local city water&power
by gcb0 14y ago
i believe you only dealt with the intended usage of the APIs and interfaces?
this may be the same as someone that sets up a SCADA to the local city water&power and believe the intranet is isolated, until a month later another contract requires for a public server in the office and they just connect the entire thing to the internet.
- AnIrishDuck 14y agoThe main difference being that the FAA would never let such an "upgrade" happen on any consumer airplane.
- gcb0 14y agoyou would be surprised. i can't vouche for FAA, but hospital equipment manufacturer have even stricter regulation and there i can vouche for way worse 'upgrades'.
- dchichkov 14y agoLet me add to the surprise. I once wrote a nice piece of software that controlled hospital equipment (automated blood coagulation analyzer, to be precise). It is a quite serious piece of equipment used for post-operation patient recovery. As far as I know, a well regulated area. Equipment went through stringent certification, passed all tests, deployed in hospitals, etc. All well and good, right? Did I mention, that I was 13, when I wrote that piece of software ;) And I guess you can imagine the quality of that code :)
- est 14y agoThe experienced outsourced QA team in India guarantees your code works properly.
- dchichkov 14y agoWell, to tell the truth, that story has happened almost twenty years back, before outsourcing really kicked in. Equipment was developed in Russia, for Russian market. And I also had some five years of playing with C/x86 asm, by the time I was 13. So no, it actually was not that bad. No kids were harmed, and no QA teams in India were involved.