3 ms·
I think this is old news. Tenure as a whole likely costs the system more than it brings in intellectual freedom benefits. It's a fallacy to think that more ex
by mathattack 14y ago
I think this is old news. Tenure as a whole likely costs the system more than it brings in intellectual freedom benefits. It's a fallacy to think that more experienced tenured teachers are better educators, when it's research success that got them tenure.
Jeff Selingo (http://www.jeffselingo.com/ http://www.jeffselingo.com/) writes extensively about how colleges are reacting to changes in demographics and technology. He doesn't think Yale or Harvard will need to change, but the public and private schools a tier below will need to. His book (http://www.amazon.com/College-Un-bound-Education-Students/dp/0544027078 http://www.amazon.com/College-Un-bound-Education-Students/dp...) is a good read for parents.
- lifeisstillgood 14y agoI think you are agreeing - It is the research that matters. Newton for example was a spectacularly bad teacher. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_of_Sir_Isaac_Newton#Academic_career http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_of_Sir_Isaac_Newton#...)
- mathattack 14y agoFor tenure and societal benefit, yes. Was so for teaching though undergrad research can be a good experience.