4 ms·

I am waiting eagerly for the network inspector. Preview (nightly): http://bits.potch.me/netpanel.png http://bits.potch.me/netpanel.png

TazeTSchnitzel 14y ago
I like the look of that. It's compact and seems to use space more efficiently than Chrome's.
- Schlaefer 14y ago
  No it does not [1]. It's one of the reasons I don't like the FF dev tools: it looks nice, but in a useable setup it feels like this: http://www.mlponies.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/officebars.png http://www.mlponies.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05... [1] http://i.imgur.com/DzOS7bB.png http://i.imgur.com/DzOS7bB.png
  - xionon 14y ago
    The only difference I see is: * method and name column swapped * green/yellow status icons added (probably 200/304?) * dark color scheme vs light color scheme Is there something I'm missing? Because it sure doesn't seem like the MS Word super-toolbar you compared it to. Or is it the tab icons? Chrome recently disabled those by default, and I'd agree that they do seem like clutter. Edit: Misread the comment you were replying to. I thought you were comparing the number of icons and tabs, but you're just talking about the size of the elements. Firefox is slightly larger, yeah.
    - Schlaefer 14y ago
      There are imho unnecessary padding and huge font sizes. For example: http://imgur.com/Cvzky1K.png http://imgur.com/Cvzky1K.png 1. Nice contrast, good padding 2. Why not the same padding as 1.? 3. To much vertical padding. Contrast: are those deactivated? 4. To much vertical padding. 5. Why is this font so huge? Or why is this sidebar font so huge: http://imgur.com/DZO4l4D.png http://imgur.com/DZO4l4D.png But I have to admit, the situation got better not worse in the last versions. But Chrome imho also has the smarter solution in the network panel: workflow over more panes. You click a request and you see the details in the main area replacing the waterfall, not adding another pane fighting for space. [edit] All a little bit smaller on the left: http://imgur.com/DooYnFY.png http://imgur.com/DooYnFY.png

TazeTSchnitzel 14y ago

I like the look of that. It's compact and seems to use space more efficiently than Chrome's.

Schlaefer 14y ago
No it does not [1]. It's one of the reasons I don't like the FF dev tools: it looks nice, but in a useable setup it feels like this: http://www.mlponies.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/officebars.png http://www.mlponies.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05... [1] http://i.imgur.com/DzOS7bB.png http://i.imgur.com/DzOS7bB.png
- xionon 14y ago
  The only difference I see is: * method and name column swapped * green/yellow status icons added (probably 200/304?) * dark color scheme vs light color scheme Is there something I'm missing? Because it sure doesn't seem like the MS Word super-toolbar you compared it to. Or is it the tab icons? Chrome recently disabled those by default, and I'd agree that they do seem like clutter. Edit: Misread the comment you were replying to. I thought you were comparing the number of icons and tabs, but you're just talking about the size of the elements. Firefox is slightly larger, yeah.
  - Schlaefer 14y ago
    There are imho unnecessary padding and huge font sizes. For example: http://imgur.com/Cvzky1K.png http://imgur.com/Cvzky1K.png 1. Nice contrast, good padding 2. Why not the same padding as 1.? 3. To much vertical padding. Contrast: are those deactivated? 4. To much vertical padding. 5. Why is this font so huge? Or why is this sidebar font so huge: http://imgur.com/DZO4l4D.png http://imgur.com/DZO4l4D.png But I have to admit, the situation got better not worse in the last versions. But Chrome imho also has the smarter solution in the network panel: workflow over more panes. You click a request and you see the details in the main area replacing the waterfall, not adding another pane fighting for space. [edit] All a little bit smaller on the left: http://imgur.com/DooYnFY.png http://imgur.com/DooYnFY.png