4 ms·

Thanks, it does look better for short distances, but still seems very fast! Seems to be around 3 seconds for the 75 frames, I think I'd like to see it half that

by jap 14y ago

Thanks, it does look better for short distances, but still seems very fast! Seems to be around 3 seconds for the 75 frames, I think I'd like to see it half that speed or less.

divy 14y ago
I should add, that's a maximum of 75 frames. We check if there are duplicate pano's on the same route and stagger them depending on distance, so you could get fewer frames. It's set to 50ms a frame atm.
- NZ_Matt 14y ago
  Ah that'll be the problem I was having, some areas don't have a high enough frequency of images available to make a good hyperlapse.
  - divy 14y ago
    It's very hit or miss. We've been calling good one's 'finds' because they're fairly rare.
    - NZ_Matt 14y ago
      It'd be neat if there was a way for people to highlight their 'finds'. You could then have a randomizer option similar to www.mapcrunch.com